Friday, October 24, 2008

What is a "Book"?

Ranganathan obviously had bound volumes in mind in 1931. For purposes of my work here and everywhere, I am happy to broaden the term. Here a book is an informative source, no matter the media or format. Sounds simple . . .

I say informative instead of information because information is what happens when someone becomes informed--takes a sign, in the semiotic sense, to be "about" some part of the tangible or intangible world, and to do so in a way that one learns. Information does not happen when you re-read yesterday's news reports unless you see or understand something you did not notice before. Informative indicates that the source has the reasonable potential to inform someone, sometime.

A source is not just a text or document, although to be about the world the source has to appear to follow shared coding and interpretation systems equivalent to those found in texts, documents and language. Any audio or visual material that can be stored and viewed again can be taken as an informative source.

The apparent coding for a source furthers implies an author or speaker. A source is then ultimately one or more persons representing themselves in the source. These persons in turn offer themselves as sources in the context of one or more communities that produce and use the source material.

The only element of a book in 1931 that is not addressed in this definition is the matter of length. The institution of coherent, book-length discourses is important to human society and to our intellectual lives, but length is not a central concern for library practice outside of the provision of shelf or file space. So I am comfortable with thinking of articles and other short sources as books so far as "books [informative sources] are for use."

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

We Don't Believe in "Skills"--We Don't Care What Students Learn "About"

I came up with these bold propositions in preparation for a presentation on assessment of information literacy programs.

We DON’T . . .
  • oBelieve in “skills”
  • oCare what students learn “about”
We DO . . .
  • oBelieve in big conceptual tools as guideposts to continuing practice
  • oBelieve in “Meaningful Learning”
  • oCare what students learn “to be”
We are VERY SERIOUS about rethinking the substance of information literacy and connecting library and information use to the lives of our students.

My main point at the time was to look at learning outcomes or goals as the key to designing useful assessments that can inform improvements in teaching and learning, and to raise these questions:

  • What are the Big Ideas or Big Tools that students can use through the rest of their lives?
  • What is stable and prevalent enough to be useful or be a foundation for learning into the future?
  • How can we move past the transmission of information and isolated skills to integrating many kinds of learning?
By the way, we are using rubrics to "measure" students' practices in authentic projects. And yeah, information literacy is about personal and social uses of books and other informative sources.